Comments on: Madden 08 (final) roster update #8 details http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:25:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: dave http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-33925 dave Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:36:38 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-33925 do they still make updates for 2008 with brett favre on jets do they still make updates for 2008 with brett favre on jets

]]> By: dave http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-153379 dave Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:36:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-153379 do they still make updates for 2008 with brett favre on jets do they still make updates for 2008 with brett favre on jets

]]> By: daniel schultz http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-32244 daniel schultz Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:54:07 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-32244 how do i put this update on my games this is my first time how do i put this update on my games this is my first time

]]> By: daniel schultz http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-153378 daniel schultz Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:54:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-153378 how do i put this update on my games this is my first time how do i put this update on my games this is my first time

]]> By: Percy http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-30130 Percy Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:56:02 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-30130 [quote comment="13906"]These updates are OK, but it still does not do justice to the Giants. People seem to forget that they dominated the playoffs. These updates don't even come close to doing justice to the D-Line. In 09, they need to come up with some cohesive ratings for an entire D-Line, because the Giants defense beat the sh*t out of every team in the playoffs. Ok, the updates to Strahan and Umenyiora are good, but I just played with them and there's really not much difference. There has to be a feature which allows the D-Line of a team like the giants to dominate with just four of them there, and allow the backs to play more coverage. I still find myself still having to sacrifice back field coverage to blitz in order to get to the QB. Also, the ratings for Toomer and Smith need to be upped. They both made clutch catches and plays during all of the playoffs. And Burress at 94 is not right, he's one of the best receivers in the league. He's been playing with a messed up ankle the entire season. And Manning didn't throw one int in the playoffs, he's definitely an accurate QB. As soon as Shockey left and stopped pestering him, he played awesome every game. But really, these updates do not do justice to the D-line.. The Robbins and Cofield should both be at least 90 with finesse or crushing.[/quote] winning the playoff doent mean nothing ok Pats were a 99 but didnt win the superbowl in 06 or 07 or 08 ok giants r still wack they prabaly get an TEAM rating of 90-93 anny higher is crazy Pats should still have a rating higher than 95 due to their offense [quote comment="13906"]These updates are OK, but it still does not do justice to the Giants. People seem to forget that they dominated the playoffs. These updates don’t even come close to doing justice to the D-Line. In 09, they need to come up with some cohesive ratings for an entire D-Line, because the Giants defense beat the sh*t out of every team in the playoffs. Ok, the updates to Strahan and Umenyiora are good, but I just played with them and there’s really not much difference. There has to be a feature which allows the D-Line of a team like the giants to dominate with just four of them there, and allow the backs to play more coverage. I still find myself still having to sacrifice back field coverage to blitz in order to get to the QB. Also, the ratings for Toomer and Smith need to be upped. They both made clutch catches and plays during all of the playoffs. And Burress at 94 is not right, he’s one of the best receivers in the league. He’s been playing with a messed up ankle the entire season. And Manning didn’t throw one int in the playoffs, he’s definitely an accurate QB. As soon as Shockey left and stopped pestering him, he played awesome every game. But really, these updates do not do justice to the D-line.. The Robbins and Cofield should both be at least 90 with finesse or crushing.[/quote]

winning the playoff doent mean nothing ok Pats were a 99 but didnt win the superbowl in 06 or 07 or 08 ok giants r still wack they prabaly get an TEAM rating of 90-93 anny higher is crazy Pats should still have a rating higher than 95 due to their offense

]]> By: Percy http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-153377 Percy Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:56:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-153377 [quote comment="13906"]These updates are OK, but it still does not do justice to the Giants. People seem to forget that they dominated the playoffs. These updates don't even come close to doing justice to the D-Line. In 09, they need to come up with some cohesive ratings for an entire D-Line, because the Giants defense beat the sh*t out of every team in the playoffs. Ok, the updates to Strahan and Umenyiora are good, but I just played with them and there's really not much difference. There has to be a feature which allows the D-Line of a team like the giants to dominate with just four of them there, and allow the backs to play more coverage. I still find myself still having to sacrifice back field coverage to blitz in order to get to the QB. Also, the ratings for Toomer and Smith need to be upped. They both made clutch catches and plays during all of the playoffs. And Burress at 94 is not right, he's one of the best receivers in the league. He's been playing with a messed up ankle the entire season. And Manning didn't throw one int in the playoffs, he's definitely an accurate QB. As soon as Shockey left and stopped pestering him, he played awesome every game. But really, these updates do not do justice to the D-line.. The Robbins and Cofield should both be at least 90 with finesse or crushing.[/quote] winning the playoff doent mean nothing ok Pats were a 99 but didnt win the superbowl in 06 or 07 or 08 ok giants r still wack they prabaly get an TEAM rating of 90-93 anny higher is crazy Pats should still have a rating higher than 95 due to their offense [quote comment="13906"]These updates are OK, but it still does not do justice to the Giants. People seem to forget that they dominated the playoffs. These updates don’t even come close to doing justice to the D-Line. In 09, they need to come up with some cohesive ratings for an entire D-Line, because the Giants defense beat the sh*t out of every team in the playoffs. Ok, the updates to Strahan and Umenyiora are good, but I just played with them and there’s really not much difference. There has to be a feature which allows the D-Line of a team like the giants to dominate with just four of them there, and allow the backs to play more coverage. I still find myself still having to sacrifice back field coverage to blitz in order to get to the QB. Also, the ratings for Toomer and Smith need to be upped. They both made clutch catches and plays during all of the playoffs. And Burress at 94 is not right, he’s one of the best receivers in the league. He’s been playing with a messed up ankle the entire season. And Manning didn’t throw one int in the playoffs, he’s definitely an accurate QB. As soon as Shockey left and stopped pestering him, he played awesome every game. But really, these updates do not do justice to the D-line.. The Robbins and Cofield should both be at least 90 with finesse or crushing.[/quote]

winning the playoff doent mean nothing ok Pats were a 99 but didnt win the superbowl in 06 or 07 or 08 ok giants r still wack they prabaly get an TEAM rating of 90-93 anny higher is crazy Pats should still have a rating higher than 95 due to their offense

]]> By: JUJU http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-21942 JUJU Fri, 23 May 2008 20:31:32 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-21942 How do I download the updated rosters for madden 08 for ps3??? How do I download the updated rosters for madden 08 for ps3???

]]> By: JUJU http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-153376 JUJU Fri, 23 May 2008 20:31:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-153376 How do I download the updated rosters for madden 08 for ps3??? How do I download the updated rosters for madden 08 for ps3???

]]> By: rob http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-21595 rob Tue, 20 May 2008 18:54:31 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-21595 never mind. it worked. for some reason it didn't work when i tried. never mind. it worked. for some reason it didn’t work when i tried.

]]> By: rob http://www.pastapadre.com/2008/02/16/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details/comment-page-5#comment-153375 rob Tue, 20 May 2008 18:54:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/2350/madden-08-final-roster-update-8-details#comment-153375 never mind. it worked. for some reason it didn't work when i tried. never mind. it worked. for some reason it didn’t work when i tried.

]]>