Comments on: Recently Traded Player DNA Changes

By: JR (cabrillo24)

JR (cabrillo24) — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:41:06 +0000

I'm going to start a second dynasty with the Knicks and do what Walsh failed to do (trade Marbury, lol).

By: Boucher

Boucher — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:17:59 +0000

Um…. when he gets it

Thumbs up please

By: badgerboy21

badgerboy21 — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:54:40 +0000

when you posting the mlb2k info???

By: Geoff

Geoff — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:14:41 +0000

I think devin harris and the nets should be upgraded more especially harris and carter

By: Zack

Zack — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:41:13 +0000

Nice write-up.

By: sdot

sdot — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:50:34 +0000

Y?? would say dat ^^^

By: pastapadre

pastapadre — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:36:49 +0000

Most people seem to notice the difference, at least in that it makes the individuals and teams play more like they do in real life. As to whether it makes the game better or more fun that is going to be subjective. I think you'd need to play the game an awful lot to notice some of the more subtle changes.

By: Coop

Coop — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:13:24 +0000

2K9's "living rosters" must be in a coma.

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 04:12:10 +0000

It's cool that you post about all these DNA changes on the players when they are traded and whatnot. But, do these actually have any significance to the gameplay at all? Has there been any noticeable difference from when you first played the game and now with the DNA changes? Because we all know EA loves to put placebo type of things in their games like in madden.

By: fat dave

fat dave — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 03:53:12 +0000

any update on a 2k9 patch??