Comments on: Madden Roster Update #17 Details

By: pier

pier — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 01:30:09 +0000

Donavon Mcnabb should be to a 94 because he lead the eagles to the NFC championship

By: giant for life

giant for life — Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:56:07 +0000

Brandon Jacobs should be no lower then a 94 overall

By: ken

ken — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:48:16 +0000

its cool, as far as ed reed not picking off Ben, i said i hated ben not that he was romo like in his ball handling, also kudos to the offensive coordinator, pretty much every (id say 90-95%) throw was on the opposite side of the field as ed reed which is incredibly smart! and just a reminder im a skins fan not ravens so im not overly hyped on flacco but 82 is too low. Remember ratings should be comparable so if the worst qb in the league (trent edwards, i know its subjective but i hate that guy) is an 85 flacco should fall in the 83-86 range 83 imho being fair…also id like to say theres a reason cam cameron went 1-15, when you tell your qb to attack polamalu (see the spelling lessons took) instead of ryan "im not good enough to start for the skins" clark chances are you wont win that game

By: felly

felly — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:29:21 +0000

how are you guys trying to ask for upgrades on sub par wrs like higgins when desean jackson is an 81 and had an awesome rookie season. wrs like steve smith of the giants eddie royal and i know there are a few more that are rated higher then d jax and it doesnt make sense. smith is an 84/85 right now and his rookie season he did wat 60 yards in the regular season. this year he had like 560 and 1 td. desean as a rookie posted 900 plus in the regular season and almost 300 in the post season and hes only an 81 come on now. EA has alot of dumb ratings in madden that mkae no sense at all, like pierce the mlb for the giants having 85 speed with 87 acc. the guy is slow period. the eagles better get a huge upgrade on the next roster update for completely beating dallas, winning on the road in the playoffs against min and in the meadowlands. and to put all the mcnabb and romo whos better talk to end. give mcnabb curtis the whole season or one true #1 wr and see wat kind of numbers he puts up again. btw eli manning shouldnt have accurate qb are you kidding me, the loss of plax really hurt hes throwing off his back foot accuarcy.

By: Pharoh

Pharoh — Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:43:48 +0000

Flacco is good but he is far from great. He did what trent dilfer did for the ravens. Do anyone know his playoff stats? I am willing to bet they a horrible. Who cares if he had no int the first two games he had no td

By: matt

matt — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:04:20 +0000

Maybe Flacco isnt that bad… maybe he went againts a very elite D as a rookie. You do know In superbowl 40 Rothlisberger had the worst qb rating of any QB who has played in a superbowl. But they won and made plays.

By: SteelCurtain

SteelCurtain — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:57:23 +0000

lol it's alright.

By: SteelCurtain

SteelCurtain — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:53:56 +0000

And I went too far with the bitch comment in that post. Sorry. I didn't see your apology later on in the other posts.

By: SteelCurtain

SteelCurtain — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:52:05 +0000

Btw…Sorry Kris. Steelers-Cardinals Super Bowl.

By: SteelCurtain

SteelCurtain — Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:51:17 +0000

Heyyyyyy Ken where are ya bro? What was all that talk about Reed being better than Polamalu? And what else did you say? Better at returning touchdowns? Uhh yeah, which is why Reed had NO picks and NO touchdowns when he played against the team you talked shit about.. The comparison has been made official now that the two teams played. Polamalu did exactly what you praised Reed for. Reed did NOTHING. As for all you other Steelers haters, get over yourself. As for everyone who wanted us to win, thanks for the support.

As for you people asking for Flacco updates…uhh…82 is too high after we showed you the real Flacco. CRUMBLING under pressure. 3 picks?? The DEFENSE kept you close…as usual. Not Flacco.

Lastly, HOW BOUT THEM STEELERS?!