<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madden 10 Blog on Ratings Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amin</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-54212</link>
		<dc:creator>amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-54212</guid>
		<description>Deangelo Hall better be at he least an 88 overall he had 5 picks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deangelo Hall better be at he least an 88 overall he had 5 picks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amin</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-192626</link>
		<dc:creator>amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-192626</guid>
		<description>Deangelo Hall better be at he least an 88 overall he had 5 picks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deangelo Hall better be at he least an 88 overall he had 5 picks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-54134</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-54134</guid>
		<description>i have an annoying feeling thats what 10 is gonna be like but since EA is listening to the community this time around i have hope they might not try and reinvent the wheel again.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have an annoying feeling thats what 10 is gonna be like but since EA is listening to the community this time around i have hope they might not try and reinvent the wheel again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-192625</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-192625</guid>
		<description>i have an annoying feeling thats what 10 is gonna be like but since EA is listening to the community this time around i have hope they might not try and reinvent the wheel again....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have an annoying feeling thats what 10 is gonna be like but since EA is listening to the community this time around i have hope they might not try and reinvent the wheel again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-54125</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-54125</guid>
		<description>id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it) &lt;--------This statement hilariously true!!! haha </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it) &lt;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;This statement hilariously true!!! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-192624</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-192624</guid>
		<description>id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it) &lt;--------This statement hilariously true!!! haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it) &lt;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;This statement hilariously true!!! haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-53866</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-53866</guid>
		<description>am i the only one that thinks this is going to be a BAD idea? They couldnt even get the ratings anywhere near realistic and they had 17+ weeks of updates and tweaks, that resulted in matt forte and a whole gaggle of unproven rookies ranking in the elite upper echelons of superstars, i like how they are being more realistic with the 99 ratings (but they should have been doing that already) following their logic though my skins (playoff contender pretty much every year for 5 years) are going to be a 77 with the cowboys giants and eagles in the high 80s, so were a better team than the eagles but ranked 10 points lower and probably on similar ratings level with the niners, rams and packers? That just doesnt make sense so again i reiterate this is a bad idea, the idiom bandaid on a boken arm comes to mind, id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i the only one that thinks this is going to be a BAD idea? They couldnt even get the ratings anywhere near realistic and they had 17+ weeks of updates and tweaks, that resulted in matt forte and a whole gaggle of unproven rookies ranking in the elite upper echelons of superstars, i like how they are being more realistic with the 99 ratings (but they should have been doing that already) following their logic though my skins (playoff contender pretty much every year for 5 years) are going to be a 77 with the cowboys giants and eagles in the high 80s, so were a better team than the eagles but ranked 10 points lower and probably on similar ratings level with the niners, rams and packers? That just doesnt make sense so again i reiterate this is a bad idea, the idiom bandaid on a boken arm comes to mind, id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-192623</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-192623</guid>
		<description>am i the only one that thinks this is going to be a BAD idea? They couldnt even get the ratings anywhere near realistic and they had 17+ weeks of updates and tweaks, that resulted in matt forte and a whole gaggle of unproven rookies ranking in the elite upper echelons of superstars, i like how they are being more realistic with the 99 ratings (but they should have been doing that already) following their logic though my skins (playoff contender pretty much every year for 5 years) are going to be a 77 with the cowboys giants and eagles in the high 80s, so were a better team than the eagles but ranked 10 points lower and probably on similar ratings level with the niners, rams and packers? That just doesnt make sense so again i reiterate this is a bad idea, the idiom bandaid on a boken arm comes to mind, id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i the only one that thinks this is going to be a BAD idea? They couldnt even get the ratings anywhere near realistic and they had 17+ weeks of updates and tweaks, that resulted in matt forte and a whole gaggle of unproven rookies ranking in the elite upper echelons of superstars, i like how they are being more realistic with the 99 ratings (but they should have been doing that already) following their logic though my skins (playoff contender pretty much every year for 5 years) are going to be a 77 with the cowboys giants and eagles in the high 80s, so were a better team than the eagles but ranked 10 points lower and probably on similar ratings level with the niners, rams and packers? That just doesnt make sense so again i reiterate this is a bad idea, the idiom bandaid on a boken arm comes to mind, id say redo the whole ratings system but im afraid theyd put out something similar to madden 08 (look up unplayable in the dictionary youll find it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy2535</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-53750</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy2535</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-53750</guid>
		<description>How come shaun alexander has been removed from madden 09??? hes only been released so he sohuld be in the free agency, unless hes retired and madden are the only people who know about it? can anyone elighten me on the situation im a seahawks fan and i still like alexander and is he going to be in the free agency for madden 2010 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come shaun alexander has been removed from madden 09??? hes only been released so he sohuld be in the free agency, unless hes retired and madden are the only people who know about it? can anyone elighten me on the situation im a seahawks fan and i still like alexander and is he going to be in the free agency for madden 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy2535</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/02/09/madden-10-blog-on-ratings-philosophy/comment-page-2#comment-192622</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy2535</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=6231#comment-192622</guid>
		<description>How come shaun alexander has been removed from madden 09??? hes only been released so he sohuld be in the free agency, unless hes retired and madden are the only people who know about it? can anyone elighten me on the situation im a seahawks fan and i still like alexander and is he going to be in the free agency for madden 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come shaun alexander has been removed from madden 09??? hes only been released so he sohuld be in the free agency, unless hes retired and madden are the only people who know about it? can anyone elighten me on the situation im a seahawks fan and i still like alexander and is he going to be in the free agency for madden 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

