<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Likely Destinations For Jay Cutler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanju</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-59286</link>
		<dc:creator>sanju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-59286</guid>
		<description>This  game is so useful. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This  game is so useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanju</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-199644</link>
		<dc:creator>sanju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-199644</guid>
		<description>This  game is so useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This  game is so useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-59285</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-59285</guid>
		<description>Side note / question - Don&#039;t QB&#039;s have their fingers on the strings of the football anymore?  Looking at Big Ben&#039;s and Cutler&#039;s screenshots, how can they throw the football that way...not touching the strings?  Wouldn&#039;t it end up looking like a stinkin&#039; kickoff?? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side note / question &#8211; Don&#039;t QB&#039;s have their fingers on the strings of the football anymore?  Looking at Big Ben&#039;s and Cutler&#039;s screenshots, how can they throw the football that way&#8230;not touching the strings?  Wouldn&#039;t it end up looking like a stinkin&#039; kickoff??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-199643</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-199643</guid>
		<description>Side note / question - Don&#039;t QB&#039;s have their fingers on the strings of the football anymore?  Looking at Big Ben&#039;s and Cutler&#039;s screenshots, how can they throw the football that way...not touching the strings?  Wouldn&#039;t it end up looking like a stinkin&#039; kickoff??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side note / question &#8211; Don&#039;t QB&#039;s have their fingers on the strings of the football anymore?  Looking at Big Ben&#039;s and Cutler&#039;s screenshots, how can they throw the football that way&#8230;not touching the strings?  Wouldn&#039;t it end up looking like a stinkin&#039; kickoff??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frenchy180</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-59246</link>
		<dc:creator>Frenchy180</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-59246</guid>
		<description>I sure hope so... I&#039;m hoping next year we take a true franchise qb with one of those first round draft picks we&#039;ve got and then fix whatever holes are leftover on our defense after this year. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope so&#8230; I&#039;m hoping next year we take a true franchise qb with one of those first round draft picks we&#039;ve got and then fix whatever holes are leftover on our defense after this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mculberson</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-59245</link>
		<dc:creator>mculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-59245</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. This deal is defintely a great one for Denver, but a not so good one for Chicago. They gave up way to much to get him.  But, hey, if they think he&#039;s going to help them win now then more power to them. I just don&#039;t see him coming in and making that big of a difference. If you compare Orton and Cutler&#039;s numbers last year, Orton really wasn&#039;t that bad. Cutler had a boat load of yards because they threw the ball all the time, but that&#039;s it. He hasn&#039;t proven to be a winner yet. 
 
Oh, well, like I said earlier, just glad to see this soap opera over with. I was getting tired of seeing Cutler&#039;s goofy, &quot;I&#039;m half-asleep&quot; looking face all over the internet anyway. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. This deal is defintely a great one for Denver, but a not so good one for Chicago. They gave up way to much to get him.  But, hey, if they think he&#039;s going to help them win now then more power to them. I just don&#039;t see him coming in and making that big of a difference. If you compare Orton and Cutler&#039;s numbers last year, Orton really wasn&#039;t that bad. Cutler had a boat load of yards because they threw the ball all the time, but that&#039;s it. He hasn&#039;t proven to be a winner yet. </p>
<p>Oh, well, like I said earlier, just glad to see this soap opera over with. I was getting tired of seeing Cutler&#039;s goofy, &quot;I&#039;m half-asleep&quot; looking face all over the internet anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mculberson</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-199641</link>
		<dc:creator>mculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-199641</guid>
		<description>I totally agree. This deal is defintely a great one for Denver, but a not so good one for Chicago. They gave up way to much to get him.  But, hey, if they think he&#039;s going to help them win now then more power to them. I just don&#039;t see him coming in and making that big of a difference. If you compare Orton and Cutler&#039;s numbers last year, Orton really wasn&#039;t that bad. Cutler had a boat load of yards because they threw the ball all the time, but that&#039;s it. He hasn&#039;t proven to be a winner yet. 
 
Oh, well, like I said earlier, just glad to see this soap opera over with. I was getting tired of seeing Cutler&#039;s goofy, &quot;I&#039;m half-asleep&quot; looking face all over the internet anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree. This deal is defintely a great one for Denver, but a not so good one for Chicago. They gave up way to much to get him.  But, hey, if they think he&#039;s going to help them win now then more power to them. I just don&#039;t see him coming in and making that big of a difference. If you compare Orton and Cutler&#039;s numbers last year, Orton really wasn&#039;t that bad. Cutler had a boat load of yards because they threw the ball all the time, but that&#039;s it. He hasn&#039;t proven to be a winner yet. </p>
<p>Oh, well, like I said earlier, just glad to see this soap opera over with. I was getting tired of seeing Cutler&#039;s goofy, &quot;I&#039;m half-asleep&quot; looking face all over the internet anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frenchy180</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-2#comment-199642</link>
		<dc:creator>Frenchy180</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-199642</guid>
		<description>I sure hope so... I&#039;m hoping next year we take a true franchise qb with one of those first round draft picks we&#039;ve got and then fix whatever holes are leftover on our defense after this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope so&#8230; I&#039;m hoping next year we take a true franchise qb with one of those first round draft picks we&#039;ve got and then fix whatever holes are leftover on our defense after this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mculberson</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-1#comment-59243</link>
		<dc:creator>mculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-59243</guid>
		<description>No need to apologize, it&#039;s all good. You were actually right in your assessment. (Not about the crack pipe, though) The Broncos got a steal in this trade if you ask me. Granted, Kyle Orton is no Jay Cutler, but if you look at their numbers last year Orton wasn&#039;t that bad. And to think Denver got Orton and 2 1st rounders and a 3rd rounder they really got a good deal in this. Kudos to Denver for taking a really crappy situation and making good on it. I think in the long run they are a better team today because of this for sure. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need to apologize, it&#039;s all good. You were actually right in your assessment. (Not about the crack pipe, though) The Broncos got a steal in this trade if you ask me. Granted, Kyle Orton is no Jay Cutler, but if you look at their numbers last year Orton wasn&#039;t that bad. And to think Denver got Orton and 2 1st rounders and a 3rd rounder they really got a good deal in this. Kudos to Denver for taking a really crappy situation and making good on it. I think in the long run they are a better team today because of this for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mculberson</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/04/02/most-likely-destinations-for-jay-cutler/comment-page-1#comment-199640</link>
		<dc:creator>mculberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=7496#comment-199640</guid>
		<description>No need to apologize, it&#039;s all good. You were actually right in your assessment. (Not about the crack pipe, though) The Broncos got a steal in this trade if you ask me. Granted, Kyle Orton is no Jay Cutler, but if you look at their numbers last year Orton wasn&#039;t that bad. And to think Denver got Orton and 2 1st rounders and a 3rd rounder they really got a good deal in this. Kudos to Denver for taking a really crappy situation and making good on it. I think in the long run they are a better team today because of this for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No need to apologize, it&#039;s all good. You were actually right in your assessment. (Not about the crack pipe, though) The Broncos got a steal in this trade if you ask me. Granted, Kyle Orton is no Jay Cutler, but if you look at their numbers last year Orton wasn&#039;t that bad. And to think Denver got Orton and 2 1st rounders and a 3rd rounder they really got a good deal in this. Kudos to Denver for taking a really crappy situation and making good on it. I think in the long run they are a better team today because of this for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

