http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-86021 juduking Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:12:02 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-86021 For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year. For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224524 juduking Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:12:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224524 For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year. For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224525 juduking Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:12:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224525 For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year. For you guys out there that are saying what warrants 60 hard earned dollars, think about it this way. What is more important to you? Gameplay that you know 2k will bring, or improvements to a game lacking gameplay in Live. Yes live looks nicer, but the realism just isnt there quite yet. Most people are basing their judgments off of a demo are you crazy? That was bare bones and 2k will always have a much deeper game. The dynasty mode is always better for 2k, the gameplay it much better, IGN gave 2k a better rating than live and they had 5 guys review the game and give their choice of which two they recommend that fans of the NBA should buy. I guess the only way I would suggest people buy live is if they like arcade games made for kids under 10 years old. Also dont give me this crap about live having better dribble moves, and a better feel. 2K beats live in every way when it comes to gameplay and control over your player. What would you rather have? One button to control how your guy shoots so you have no control over the situation or would you rather have total control how a player shoots. I would rather be in control of how my player dribbles, shoots, plays defense, and runs the court. In live everything is a preset animation, you have no control and for players that like realism thats bad news. But go ahead waste your 60 dollars on a game that may have improved, Id rather spend my money on something I know Im going to like even if you think its just a facelift(which is not true). My money goes with 2K this year and every year.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-85604 THEBOAT87 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:58:13 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-85604 The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic. The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224522 THEBOAT87 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:58:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224522 The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic. The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224523 THEBOAT87 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:58:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224523 The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic. The pick and roll is unstoppable and help defense is horrible. Dwight Howard dunks on two to three people at a time, the game is not imporved, the players (especially guards) are slower this year, the dribble moves are almost non existent compared to last year I think. The only thing I like about this game is that Kobe can not be stopped, which is realistic.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-85314 ted Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:56:11 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-85314 I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it... this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it… this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224520 ted Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:56:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224520 I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it... this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it… this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-224521 ted Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:56:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-224521 I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it... this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN I only got to demo live on the PS3 and liked it… this will be the first time I'll be picking up live over 2K since 2006. 2K messe dup by not having up a demo on the PSN

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/09/28/nba-2k10-initial-impressions/comment-page-6#comment-85256 valdarez Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:12:26 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=11081#comment-85256 What framerate issues? I've been playing My Player for over a week now in 2K camera and not a single frame rate issue. Take Padre's comments with a grain of salt. They are always tilted towards favor for EA and against 2K. What framerate issues? I've been playing My Player for over a week now in 2K camera and not a single frame rate issue. Take Padre's comments with a grain of salt. They are always tilted towards favor for EA and against 2K.

]]>