http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:55:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-91345 Pete Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:52:19 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-91345 I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world.....it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world…..it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232607 Pete Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:52:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232607 I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world.....it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world…..it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232608 Pete Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:52:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232608 I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world.....it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol I agree with you KcKing2 it kind of gives away part of the ending. Now we know 2012 isn't the end of the world…..it's 2013 when John Cusack's double becomes el presidente of the earth. lol

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-91274 ribbz Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:31:04 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-91274 rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper. rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232605 ribbz Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:31:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232605 rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper. rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232606 ribbz Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:31:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232606 rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper. rottentomatoes outlook is not so good for this one. sucks because it was probably a good idea on paper.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-91269 question.. Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:22:40 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-91269 Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world - electricity, ground beneath our feet those things - will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work. Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world – electricity, ground beneath our feet those things – will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232603 question.. Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:22:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232603 Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world - electricity, ground beneath our feet those things - will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work. Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world – electricity, ground beneath our feet those things – will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-232604 question.. Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:22:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-232604 Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world - electricity, ground beneath our feet those things - will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work. Not necessarily. It's implied that the modern world – electricity, ground beneath our feet those things – will be completely destroyed. I actually think this could work.

]]> http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/05/tv-version-of-2012-being-developed/comment-page-1#comment-91246 pastapadre Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:20:02 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=12833#comment-91246 Not necessarily. The dinosaurs didn't die out overnight. There could be pockets of survivors in an "end of the world" scenario. Not necessarily. The dinosaurs didn't die out overnight. There could be pockets of survivors in an "end of the world" scenario.

]]>