Comments on: Review: 2012 http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: fuck ea http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-92803 fuck ea Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:21:38 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-92803 the picture itself shows how bad this movie was the picture itself shows how bad this movie was

]]> By: fuck ea http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-234180 fuck ea Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:21:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-234180 the picture itself shows how bad this movie was the picture itself shows how bad this movie was

]]> By: Valdarez http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-92785 Valdarez Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:19:34 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-92785 No. You grow up. It was that bad. See how silly that looks? :) I'm just telling you what I experienced at the theater. Great special effects with cheazy writing. If that's your thing, more power to you. People at the theater I was at were laughing at it, not enthralled at the world ending or captured by the ever so thin story line. I don't think the special effects will play out as well on the small screen (home TV), for big sequence events they typically don't. Take Titanic for example, the effects of the ship sinking at the end looked great at theaters but looked small / cheap at home on the small screen. Screen size matters for large scale special effects in movies that are primarily based upon them. No. You grow up. It was that bad.

See how silly that looks? :)

I'm just telling you what I experienced at the theater. Great special effects with cheazy writing. If that's your thing, more power to you. People at the theater I was at were laughing at it, not enthralled at the world ending or captured by the ever so thin story line. I don't think the special effects will play out as well on the small screen (home TV), for big sequence events they typically don't. Take Titanic for example, the effects of the ship sinking at the end looked great at theaters but looked small / cheap at home on the small screen. Screen size matters for large scale special effects in movies that are primarily based upon them.

]]> By: Valdarez http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-234179 Valdarez Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:19:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-234179 No. You grow up. It was that bad. See how silly that looks? :) I'm just telling you what I experienced at the theater. Great special effects with cheazy writing. If that's your thing, more power to you. People at the theater I was at were laughing at it, not enthralled at the world ending or captured by the ever so thin story line. I don't think the special effects will play out as well on the small screen (home TV), for big sequence events they typically don't. Take Titanic for example, the effects of the ship sinking at the end looked great at theaters but looked small / cheap at home on the small screen. Screen size matters for large scale special effects in movies that are primarily based upon them. No. You grow up. It was that bad.

See how silly that looks? :)

I'm just telling you what I experienced at the theater. Great special effects with cheazy writing. If that's your thing, more power to you. People at the theater I was at were laughing at it, not enthralled at the world ending or captured by the ever so thin story line. I don't think the special effects will play out as well on the small screen (home TV), for big sequence events they typically don't. Take Titanic for example, the effects of the ship sinking at the end looked great at theaters but looked small / cheap at home on the small screen. Screen size matters for large scale special effects in movies that are primarily based upon them.

]]> By: Tim http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-92769 Tim Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:34:08 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-92769 Grow up dude. It wasn't that bad. Grow up dude. It wasn't that bad.

]]> By: Tim http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-234178 Tim Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:34:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-234178 Grow up dude. It wasn't that bad. Grow up dude. It wasn't that bad.

]]> By: Valdarez http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-92722 Valdarez Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:18:36 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-92722 This was a horrible movie. On opening night, half of the theater was laughing at the unending / unrealistic escape scenarios and some of the horrible writing. When Tamara died, someone shouted out 'there's no more Tamara' (sounds like 'tomorrow'). Cusack really let his fans down on this one. He never should have done this movie. Unless you want to waste to hours of your life and throw away $10, I suggest avoiding this movie. Can't even see renting it unless you want to rip on it with some friends. This was a horrible movie. On opening night, half of the theater was laughing at the unending / unrealistic escape scenarios and some of the horrible writing. When Tamara died, someone shouted out 'there's no more Tamara' (sounds like 'tomorrow').

Cusack really let his fans down on this one. He never should have done this movie. Unless you want to waste to hours of your life and throw away $10, I suggest avoiding this movie. Can't even see renting it unless you want to rip on it with some friends.

]]> By: Valdarez http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-234177 Valdarez Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:18:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-234177 This was a horrible movie. On opening night, half of the theater was laughing at the unending / unrealistic escape scenarios and some of the horrible writing. When Tamara died, someone shouted out 'there's no more Tamara' (sounds like 'tomorrow'). Cusack really let his fans down on this one. He never should have done this movie. Unless you want to waste to hours of your life and throw away $10, I suggest avoiding this movie. Can't even see renting it unless you want to rip on it with some friends. This was a horrible movie. On opening night, half of the theater was laughing at the unending / unrealistic escape scenarios and some of the horrible writing. When Tamara died, someone shouted out 'there's no more Tamara' (sounds like 'tomorrow').

Cusack really let his fans down on this one. He never should have done this movie. Unless you want to waste to hours of your life and throw away $10, I suggest avoiding this movie. Can't even see renting it unless you want to rip on it with some friends.

]]> By: pastapadre http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-92671 pastapadre Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:26:35 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-92671 Yeah it was a delicate role cause it could have easily been way over the top. Woody definitely had fun with it but kept it from being ridiculous. Yeah it was a delicate role cause it could have easily been way over the top. Woody definitely had fun with it but kept it from being ridiculous.

]]> By: pastapadre http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/15/review-2012/comment-page-1#comment-234176 pastapadre Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:26:00 +0000 http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13227#comment-234176 Yeah it was a delicate role cause it could have easily been way over the top. Woody definitely had fun with it but kept it from being ridiculous. Yeah it was a delicate role cause it could have easily been way over the top. Woody definitely had fun with it but kept it from being ridiculous.

]]>