<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madden 10 Roster Update #9 Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:02:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-4#comment-113793</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-113793</guid>
		<description>simply terrible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simply terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KrazyEaglesFan</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-104675</link>
		<dc:creator>KrazyEaglesFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-104675</guid>
		<description>No Akeem Jordan INC? how do the eagles go down in rating? Jason Peters make PB and goes down in rating. no Maclin increase? I am sorry but avant is a low 80s wr. Give some offensive line love. 3 of them are 2nd string and look what the eagles are doing. If desean is not 99 speed, the game is getting tossed. Jaqua Parker and Darren Howard could use some love also.  Both DTs could use a bump up. they are still pretty good at sealing the gaps.  Gocong down. reggie brown down. sean jones cvg down,  agree with Wbrook dropping, but lesean goes up 1 point? Jamaal Jackson needs to go on IR. Hanson tackle and man up....locked out Marshall on a lot of screen plays and is much smaller that that big WR. Asante up and GOD SHELDON BROWN NEEDS TO GO UP!!!!! he is on of the best shutdown corners in the NFL. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Akeem Jordan INC? how do the eagles go down in rating? Jason Peters make PB and goes down in rating. no Maclin increase? I am sorry but avant is a low 80s wr. Give some offensive line love. 3 of them are 2nd string and look what the eagles are doing. If desean is not 99 speed, the game is getting tossed. Jaqua Parker and Darren Howard could use some love also.  Both DTs could use a bump up. they are still pretty good at sealing the gaps.  Gocong down. reggie brown down. sean jones cvg down,  agree with Wbrook dropping, but lesean goes up 1 point? Jamaal Jackson needs to go on IR. Hanson tackle and man up&#8230;.locked out Marshall on a lot of screen plays and is much smaller that that big WR. Asante up and GOD SHELDON BROWN NEEDS TO GO UP!!!!! he is on of the best shutdown corners in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-102748</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-102748</guid>
		<description>Jamarcus Russle should have gone down more he is terrible </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamarcus Russle should have gone down more he is terrible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zxy-ftw</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-1#comment-97916</link>
		<dc:creator>zxy-ftw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-97916</guid>
		<description>people look at other player ratings who are a 99 and ask &quot;why did they get dropped after one bad week on a bad team?&quot; the simple answer to this is that a great player (ranked in the high 90&#039;s) should be great no matter what team they&#039;re playing with. i do disagree with lowering him because he&#039;s still dominating on an awful raider&#039;s defense, probably more than he did with the patriots bcuz the patriots were so stacked all around he never stood out that much. players like him are just freaks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people look at other player ratings who are a 99 and ask &quot;why did they get dropped after one bad week on a bad team?&quot; the simple answer to this is that a great player (ranked in the high 90&#039;s) should be great no matter what team they&#039;re playing with. i do disagree with lowering him because he&#039;s still dominating on an awful raider&#039;s defense, probably more than he did with the patriots bcuz the patriots were so stacked all around he never stood out that much. players like him are just freaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logan24shark</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-97359</link>
		<dc:creator>logan24shark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-97359</guid>
		<description>why no kyle eckel for new orleans and heath evans on ir </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why no kyle eckel for new orleans and heath evans on ir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jharris7</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-96049</link>
		<dc:creator>jharris7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-96049</guid>
		<description>adrian peterson truck over rated, should be 91 or 92 not 97</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adrian peterson truck over rated, should be 91 or 92 not 97</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-95710</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-95710</guid>
		<description>I think it is time to put Miles Austin&#039;s ratings where they belong.  He keeps putting up big numbers.  It is no fluke.  I was skeptical as well.  I kept waiting for his production to drop off.  Granted in the Philly game they shut him down pretty well, but when he did get the ball finally it was a big TD.  Raiders, yeah they stink now, but they have a very solid D, and their corner is the best.  Austin went off for 6 or 7 grabs, a TD, and almost 150 yds..... again!  I think his physical skills are pretty good as they are rated now, though he plays stronger than a 60 or whatever his rating is.  However, his catching should be a bit higher, CIT, and JMP as well.  Granted he did drop a few balls lately, but that was to be expected.  It was still not like the TO show where he dropped balls more than he dropped dime on his teammates.  I would have to look at his stats again, but his overall should be around 91, give or take.  He isnot dominant like A. Johnson..... yet, he prolly never will be, there is a freak of nature I&#039;d love to have on my team, but I believe Miles is really sprouting and finding himself.  He&#039;s definately a 90&#039;s player, without question.  Williams on the other hand, may be rated a tad too high.  Also i have a question, why is it so difficult to get sacks with D - Ware?  Ive tried everything and he does mediocre at best.  Seems like its much easier for D-linemen to get sacks than LBs.  But at any rate, Ware should b a monster, yet i only get about 6 sacks a year out of him if i&#039;m lucky.  Is there a bias toward LBs getting sacks?  Doesn&#039;t seem like it coz the other LBs seemto do fine.  And for the record, I blitz him A TON.  So lack of opportunity isnt there.  I even have him cover about 20% of the time just to keep em honest.  He seems to get more pics than sacks tho still.  Grrrrrr !!!!!  Other than that, great game.  Just one more thing.  I can dominate in All Pro, and All Madden is downright ridiculously impossible.  Any chance of a change here?  I love this game and competition, just hate it when a LB jumps backwards, against the grain ( the direction he was running til I threw the ball ) and jumps up 20 feet in the air and deftly pics off my pass on All Madden.  They do ridiculous things at this level, yet All Pro is a bit easy for me.  I know I should go with the player skill rating thing, but still, maybe put another setting in there?  Like .... Rookie, Pro, All - Pro, Realistic, All Madden?  Been playing the game since the original first came out like everyone that was old enuff to has.  Greatest thing since sliced bread!  Football Rules !  NFL is the only way to go !  Go Cowboys !!!!!!  ( crosses fingers and toes .... it is December after all )  Thanx gang</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is time to put Miles Austin&#8217;s ratings where they belong.  He keeps putting up big numbers.  It is no fluke.  I was skeptical as well.  I kept waiting for his production to drop off.  Granted in the Philly game they shut him down pretty well, but when he did get the ball finally it was a big TD.  Raiders, yeah they stink now, but they have a very solid D, and their corner is the best.  Austin went off for 6 or 7 grabs, a TD, and almost 150 yds&#8230;.. again!  I think his physical skills are pretty good as they are rated now, though he plays stronger than a 60 or whatever his rating is.  However, his catching should be a bit higher, CIT, and JMP as well.  Granted he did drop a few balls lately, but that was to be expected.  It was still not like the TO show where he dropped balls more than he dropped dime on his teammates.  I would have to look at his stats again, but his overall should be around 91, give or take.  He isnot dominant like A. Johnson&#8230;.. yet, he prolly never will be, there is a freak of nature I&#8217;d love to have on my team, but I believe Miles is really sprouting and finding himself.  He&#8217;s definately a 90&#8217;s player, without question.  Williams on the other hand, may be rated a tad too high.  Also i have a question, why is it so difficult to get sacks with D &#8211; Ware?  Ive tried everything and he does mediocre at best.  Seems like its much easier for D-linemen to get sacks than LBs.  But at any rate, Ware should b a monster, yet i only get about 6 sacks a year out of him if i&#8217;m lucky.  Is there a bias toward LBs getting sacks?  Doesn&#8217;t seem like it coz the other LBs seemto do fine.  And for the record, I blitz him A TON.  So lack of opportunity isnt there.  I even have him cover about 20% of the time just to keep em honest.  He seems to get more pics than sacks tho still.  Grrrrrr !!!!!  Other than that, great game.  Just one more thing.  I can dominate in All Pro, and All Madden is downright ridiculously impossible.  Any chance of a change here?  I love this game and competition, just hate it when a LB jumps backwards, against the grain ( the direction he was running til I threw the ball ) and jumps up 20 feet in the air and deftly pics off my pass on All Madden.  They do ridiculous things at this level, yet All Pro is a bit easy for me.  I know I should go with the player skill rating thing, but still, maybe put another setting in there?  Like &#8230;. Rookie, Pro, All &#8211; Pro, Realistic, All Madden?  Been playing the game since the original first came out like everyone that was old enuff to has.  Greatest thing since sliced bread!  Football Rules !  NFL is the only way to go !  Go Cowboys !!!!!!  ( crosses fingers and toes &#8230;. it is December after all )  Thanx gang</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dubweezy</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-2#comment-95469</link>
		<dc:creator>dubweezy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-95469</guid>
		<description>yall chill i misunderstood the meaning of patch 
but the ratings do actually mean something 
so i dunno what youre talking about... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yall chill i misunderstood the meaning of patch<br />
but the ratings do actually mean something<br />
so i dunno what youre talking about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slim</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-95476</link>
		<dc:creator>slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-95476</guid>
		<description>         ea need put more wildcat plays in because the old ones are predictable </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ea need put more wildcat plays in because the old ones are predictable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saints fan</title>
		<link>http://www.pastapadre.com/2009/11/19/madden-10-roster-update-9-details/comment-page-3#comment-94959</link>
		<dc:creator>saints fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastapadre.com/?p=13423#comment-94959</guid>
		<description>wheres kyle eckel, and mike mckenzie not even a free agent? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheres kyle eckel, and mike mckenzie not even a free agent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
