Recently Traded Player DNA Changes

by pastapadre
Posted December 1st, 2008 at 7:50 am

A few games have now been played since the trading that went down in the NBA between the Knicks, Warriors, and Clippers. The Knicks gained Tim Thomas, Cuttino Mobley, and Al Harrington. The Warriors received Jamal Crawford while the Clippers got Zach Randolph. Now that NBA Live 09 has received the data from these first games with their new teams we can look at how the players are adapting via their DNA make-up as of 11/30.

Jamal Crawford has played four games with the Warriors all of them losses. He is averaging 15.8 PPG, 6 APG, and 5.3 RPG but is only shooting 34%. He is seeing slightly more pick and roll and spotting up with less isolation and practically no more off-ball screens.

Zach Randolph has played in two games for the Clippers with a 1-1 record. He has totaled 17 PPG and 8.5 RPG. He had one big game against the Heat on the 29th going for 27 points and 13 boards and the previous game didn’t do much finishing with just 7 points and 4 rebounds. His DNA looks similar but there has been a shift as he is posting up and cutting more while seeing less isolation.

Al Harrington has done extremely well in the first three games with the Knicks. He is averaging 24.7 PPG and 9.3 RPG. His DNA for New York is almost identical to what it used to be for Golden State.

Tim Thomas has contributed relatively well so far with 14.3 PPG and 7 RPG in the first three with New York. He has been posting up more and getting some time as a pick and roll ball handler while spotting up less and losing off-ball screens.

Tags:

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

12 ResponsesLeave a comment
  • Tony R
    December 1, 2008 at 3:28 am
    Reply

    nice. the articles youve done about dna changes have been awesome thanks

  • swizzy
    December 1, 2008 at 3:51 am
    Reply

    dats Y da G's play LIVE

    if UR not 2ND UR LAST

  • fat dave
    December 1, 2008 at 3:53 am
    Reply

    any update on a 2k9 patch??

  • Dave
    December 1, 2008 at 4:12 am
    Reply

    It's cool that you post about all these DNA changes on the players when they are traded and whatnot. But, do these actually have any significance to the gameplay at all? Has there been any noticeable difference from when you first played the game and now with the DNA changes? Because we all know EA loves to put placebo type of things in their games like in madden.

  • Coop
    December 1, 2008 at 4:13 am
    Reply

    2K9's "living rosters" must be in a coma.

  • pastapadre
    December 1, 2008 at 4:36 am
    Reply

    Most people seem to notice the difference, at least in that it makes the individuals and teams play more like they do in real life. As to whether it makes the game better or more fun that is going to be subjective. I think you'd need to play the game an awful lot to notice some of the more subtle changes.

  • sdot
    December 1, 2008 at 4:50 am
    Reply

    Y?? would say dat ^^^

  • Zack
    December 1, 2008 at 5:41 am
    Reply

    Nice write-up.

  • Geoff
    December 1, 2008 at 7:14 am
    Reply

    I think devin harris and the nets should be upgraded more especially harris and carter

  • badgerboy21
    December 1, 2008 at 7:54 am
    Reply

    when you posting the mlb2k info???

  • Boucher
    December 1, 2008 at 8:17 am
    Reply

    Um…. when he gets it

    Thumbs up please

  • JR (cabrillo24)
    December 2, 2008 at 12:41 pm
    Reply

    I'm going to start a second dynasty with the Knicks and do what Walsh failed to do (trade Marbury, lol).

Add a commentGet a Gravatar

* Name

* Email Address

Website Address

You can usethese tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Sponsors
Around The Sites
Categories
Featured Video
Tags
Quantcast