The Wrap-Up: MLB 09 The Show

by pastapadre
Posted March 6th, 2009 at 6:55 pm

mlb09theshow0306a

At times I’ve had some difficulty writing about The Show over the last couple months which is actually due to what a quality product 08 was. Usually you can assess the previous iteration and have an idea of what you’re looking for out of the next. With 08 the only real glaring weakness was with online play. It is tougher to identify and discuss the improvements to a game when it was already so good to begin with.

So that’s where I start when evaluating MLB 09 The Show. I already knew it was a really good game. But would the enhancements and additions stand out when playing it extensively? And has SCEA done enough to justify the purchase of a game that didn’t add any big new features? Continue on for “The Wrap-Up” on MLB 09 The Show.

When I say there are no big new features that doesn’t mean there isn’t anything that stands out immediately because there is. The lighting in the game is amazing. There really is no other sports game that comes close to how well it has been done here. Graphically overall MLB 09 could stand up against any sports title released and is arguably the cleanest and best looking of this generation.

The authenticity on and off the field is unmatched. It’s the little things that really makes everyone recognize what an achievement the game is and adds a great deal of longevity and value. You appreciate the work that went into the game more because of that. Gameplay wise the best way to sum it up is by saying it is a fantastic simulation of the actual sport. It is a baseball video game, not video game baseball.

The pitching meter has been adjusted some for this year and it results in pitches being less reliable. And that is a good thing. I like to pitch from the behind the pitcher view, with no strike zone, ball cursor, or vibration. It makes it very challenging to spot pitches accurately. The result is more excitement and nerves and realistic pitch counts.

Working the count in The Show is the best way for success at the plate. I still struggle to string together hits which ends up meaning more runs are accounted for via the home run than probably should be. I think that could be something that varies from user to user though.

Road to the Show has received some enhancements, though I really didn’t notice many differences at least that stood out in my time with it outside of some new options. I still prefer being a relief pitcher but now that they’ve offered the option to skip base running I’m going to consider playing a position in the field. Unfortunately for those who actually like running the bases the camera is broken which makes for an adventure. Still the mode helps separate the game from the competition in terms of depth and variety. It’s good enough that it could stand on its own as a separate game but you get it included.

mlb09theshow0306c

The screenshot feature is actually something that is built into the PS3 that any game can take advantage of but few have. Thankfully The Show includes the functionality and it is the best to date. The image quality is fantastic and unlike other screenshot features it isn’t limited to taking them in replay mode. As long as you’re playing MLB 09 you can capture anything that comes on screen including on-going gameplay action and while in the menus.

They also added a highlight saving feature. While they don’t have a way to upload directly to a website like EA and 2K do you can transfer them to your computer just like the screenshots and upload them to a hosting site from there. The quality is quite good as well although they don’t come out in full HD. The thing is that recording the highlights is anything but user friendly. It is really awkward and difficult to utilize. While you have full freedom to move the camera around you can’t do cuts so you’re seeing all the movement as opposed to being able to cut to different angles.

I’m not a fan of the home run cut scenes. I’d rather get to see the ball sailing out. The instant cut to the batter for his reaction could be powerful if it was rare but seeing it every time now takes some of the excitement of a big home run away.

The loading times once again are on the long side. That hampers the experience especially for people going through Road to the Show at a quick pace. Loading in and out of gamesĀ  frequently just accents how long those load times are. This is probably more of a PS3/Blu-ray issue though than it is The Show’s fault.

I really hope that SCEA doesn’t cave to the people who are claiming the game needs to utilize the right stick more. If they do I’m pleading to only make right stick functionality as an additional option and not the defaults. Innovation for the sake of innovation is not a good idea. There is no reason to change the best pitching system and best batting system on the market today in order to present a image of innovation via the gimmicks of their inferior competition. The only RS functionality I actually like is throwing to the bases. The others offer nothing more than being able to claim they are innovative and “next-gen”.

Online play has been the achilles heel for SCEA’s MLB franchise for years now. Unfortunately that continues to be the case. Click here to read the most extensive online play analysis available for MLB 09.

The Wrap-Up

MLB 09 The Show isn’t just aimed at gamers but also at the hardcore baseball fans. It is remarkable the level of authenticity and polished gameplay being offered. This is a game that is selling PS3s. It’s a game that the Madden developers are praising. However online play continues to prevent The Show from providing the total package and fulfilling its potential to be the best and most complete sports title on the market.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

87 ResponsesLeave a comment
  • blondeviking64
    March 9, 2009 at 4:05 pm
    Reply

    LOL, how many players are there in MLB? Do you include AAA and AA players in that. If you do then there are a ton of players to keep track of. I cant imagine not missing a few minor players. And besides there will be roster updates as the year progresses which should help keep things accurate (I hope)

  • blake jays fan
    March 9, 2009 at 5:45 pm
    Reply

    Hey guys, i'm playing the show on a 42' plasma LG. I don't have a hdmi cable. i'm thinking about buying one how much better will it look Ex. lighting

    • nyr2k2
      March 9, 2009 at 6:24 pm
      Reply

      Much better! I used to just play with a component cable on a non-HD set, then eventually bought a S-video cable. The difference there was night and day. After buying an HD set and using HDMI cables, I can't believe I ever played without them.

      Also, don't get suckered into buying $100 HDMI cables. The cheaper cables ($30 or so) are JUST as effective and durable. This is coming from a guy the used to swear by Monster Cables.

      • Sidewinder
        March 9, 2009 at 9:09 pm
        Reply

        NY probably meant to say he had composite cables, not component. Composite cables are the basic RCA cables of the last 40 years. Component cables are HD but have the video separated from the audio, where HDMI has them all in one. Video wise components are every bit as good as HDMI except when it comes to 1080P/24 movies. It wont do that, but it will do standard 1080P if your TV has 1080P component imputs. My Sony A3000 60" does and it looks great. My 360 is the older one without HDMI, so I use component and I get a 1080P signal.

    • T. Daley
      March 9, 2009 at 8:10 pm
      Reply

      Blake: HDMI cables are generally better than component cables. If you plan on running the game at 1080p then you must have an HDMI cable. The show is optimized to run at 720p so you don't have to use an HDMI cable. The one advantage to using HDMI is that it can carry both sound and video signals through the one cable.

      As far as picture quality goes, at 720p you wont see any significant improvement in picture quality if you go HDMI over RGB component cables. However using cheaper cables isn't the same as using a higher quality cable such as monster. Better quality cables will give you a better picture.

      Personally I run all monster cables (HDMI) for the video, Optical for sound and I run a Sony Bravia XBR4 46". My sound system is a bose lifestyle 5.1. My sound and picture quality is flawless.

      If your TV is a 1080p television then you need to go with the HDMI so you can get the full benefit of 1080p ( Blueray movies, Games that run in 1080p)

      • nyr2k2
        March 9, 2009 at 9:09 pm
        Reply

        I don't know, T. Daley. As I said, I used to swear by Monster Cable products. I kept reading various places that cheaper cables produced the same picture quality, so I picked one up. My buddy and I did a side-by-side comparison with our PS3s running Uncharted: Drake's fortune, and I couldn't notice any difference (the "budget" cable was a Mad Catz). I'm not going to go as far as to say there is NO difference whatsoever, but to my eye they looked pretty damn identical.

        Judging by your setup you seem to be pretty adamant about having the absolute best quality electronics and components, so I'll take your word for it that I was right all along and Monster Cable is better. However, since this guy seems to be in the same category as me–not too die-hard about it–I think it's worth saving 50-70 bucks.

        Just my opinion though!

      • Sidewinder
        March 9, 2009 at 9:20 pm
        Reply

        Ouch, Daley bought into the marketing hype of Monster HDMI cables and paid the price. You could have bought two new games instead. You could buy great HDMI cables for under $10. Check out Amazon. It's digital buddy, you wont notice a difference, only on analog signals using an analog cable will you notice a difference. I applaude your TV choice but Bose buddy, Bose? You must have a smaller room or a SWF….significant wife factor.:)

        I must admit to buying Bose bookshelf speakers 20 years ago and always liked them, no matter what the audiophiles say. My little brother has them now as his surrounds.

  • Sidewinder
    March 9, 2009 at 8:36 pm
    Reply

    Daley knows his stuff. Good post.

  • Smokez4Dayz
    March 10, 2009 at 5:54 am
    Reply

    same 10 year pitching meter. how is a pitching meter simulate real pitching? Whats wrong with have a ten month turnaround and not just update the rosters. If any other company did that, you losers would be crying about. Your precious MLB is just 07 with new graphics, and everybody is ready to buy a whole system to play one game. Love the financial responsibility. copycats ruining america, no originality anymore, and the little pre teens think its cool to be a follower. And your boards and articles prove this theory everyday. We have become a nation of followers, and wait for someone to show me what to like-kind of people. Its sad. Just ten years ago, we wasn't like this.

  • The_King_Wilmes
    March 30, 2009 at 12:25 am
    Reply

    MLB 09 is by far the greatest video game expeience I've ever had. I usually get bored of a game after a month of purchasing it. Not The Show every game is exciting. I'm playing at a difficult level in franchise mode and I'm 21-15

  • ladegerat
    September 15, 2009 at 5:27 am
    Reply

    Hi,
    First of all thanks for your review.I played The MLB 08 which was a nice one. Now for the '09 Show', I have seen the game-play videos and I really like the AI and whole game-play with great graphics.They provided very nice game to us.

Add a commentGet a Gravatar

* Name

* Email Address

Website Address

You can usethese tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Sponsors
Around The Sites
Categories
Featured Video
Tags
Quantcast