Madden NFL 12 Team Ratings Arriving Ahead of the Players

by
Posted July 22nd, 2011 at 6:55 pm

ESPN has started laying out team overall ratings by division in the lead-up to the player rating reveals which will begin in early August. The team ratings are somewhat meaningless at this point given free agency is still yet to occur and major trades could happen but it does provide an opportunity to see any impact from rookies and how the rosters are as they currently stand. The AFC WestAFC East, and AFC North are the first divisions to be broken down.

San Diego Chargers (85), Kansas City Chiefs (84), Oakland Raiders (76), Denver Broncos (74)
New England Patriots (88), New York Jets (87), Miami Dolphins (78), Buffalo Bills (73)
Pittsburgh Steelers (90), Baltimore Ravens (86), Cleveland Browns (74), Cincinnati Bengals (71)

  • http://twitter.com/laker42594 Ryan Cohen

    Am i the only one who thinks the broncos are better than the raiders?

    • Guest

      59-14 better?

      • Giantjedi

        That was ridiculous, that’s usually the score my little brother gets when he plays Madden on rookie mode.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MFD6K3UIFSDLU4HX5BGOREQABM Matt W

      I just don’t see it.  The Broncos D is totally pourous even though they have some good individual players.  Offensively, the Broncos have Brandon Lloyd and not much else going for them.  

      • GoldenGophersQB5

        Aye now they got my homie @ WR Eric Decker

    • The360King

      In a word…YES.

    • Rasewar

      Yes

    • Smsixx

      Well since the Raiders went 6-0 vs. the AFC West last season that point can easily be argued.

      • Connor

        and they still failed to make the playoffs. lmao

    • Smsixx

      Well since the Raiders went 6-0 vs. the AFC West last season that point can easily be argued.

    • Leftysmoke

      Yeah. If you’re an idiot.

    • Crazy Jay2427

      alot of teams are better than the raiders

  • Da84tona

    Glad to see my Chiefs get a little love. Sounds like they are going to be forced to be active in free agency thanks to the new minimum salary cap, which I love hearing because they NEVER go after big name free agents.

  • SSCOVER1

    Broncos were in the bottom 5 in the NFL last year, and the Raiders swept them in the Division games… Why would you think the Broncos are better?

  • coolcam

    good, the patriots are the best in the east :p

  • Anonymous

    Intresting, only one team at 90. Seems like they’re bringing down the team ratings a bit

  • http://twitter.com/seanintheoc Sean

    The Broncos are not better than the Raiders.  Plus today one of their players was accused of drugging and raping a girl and impregnating her.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000295534671 Jared Baxter

      What does that have to do with ratings?

    • Adam

      Well, now that he was found guilty, EA has to lower the team’s rating by 20 points.

      Don’t be ridiculous.

    • Papelbon5821

      Who are you Donny Moore?

  • Phaggots

    Broncos are way better than the Raider. Tim Tebow ran a 40+ yarder on his first NFL start. He should have a 90+ SPD. How is it that the Raider beat the whole division and not make the playoffs???

    • Guest

      First off, Tim Tebow is a mediocre quarterback at best, see that he excels at nothing a quarterback is suppose to excel at. How is running 40 yards make you a good quarterback? The Browns punter ran farther than that, it doesn’t make him a good punter. Second off, @04dd3ad105f315d2a6db6d1a2590f989:disqus did not say the Raiders beat the entire division; he said that they swept the Broncos. The Raiders did not make the playoffs because Kansas City and San Diego are better teams. 

      • quay901

        The Raiders did swept the AFC WEST but only had an 8-8 and the Chiefs had the best record in the AFC WEST. That’s y they got in the playoffs u check any websites that have football stats to verify that.

        • Rkaiser1111

          THEY DID WIN ALL THERE DIV GMS

          • AdamBroncos

            They won all of their division games, but went 2-8 against the rest of the NFL.

            Unless every playoff team last year was in the AFC West, they would have been crushed in the first round.

          • The360King

            They still would have fared better than the Chiefs did in their playoff game, (who got crushed in the first round). The Raiders were actually hot at the end of the season.  Bad coaching decisions, an injured McFadden and an inability to stop the run consistently killed the season late.  

            I still don’t know what the Chiefs were thinking playing Cassell the whole game against the Raiders the last game of the regular season.  He was getting pounded.  That HAD to have an effect on how he played in the playoffs. They still wouldn’t have beaten the Ravens, but at least they might have been able to look like they deserved to be on the field.

            I think the Raiders, Chiefs and Chargers are actually pretty close in talent and should be rated a little closer.  This will all change after free agency.

      • Aman128ok

        Stop bashing Tebow he has only had one year to play and only started 3 games and was 1-2 in those games….. give him a chance and not to mention he had and impressive 684 yards 5tds and 3int in those 3 games while also rushing for 227 yrds and 6 tds so shutup and go look at some statistics ok!

      • Fireflyjam

        Reddgie Hodge’s speed SHOULD be higher…actually. =)

    • Farttits

      90 SPD? That’s fucking hilarious. Tebow is a 4.7 guy. Come back to reality.

      • Guest

        Lets not forget that he’s white.

    • Adam (Go Broncos!)

      I’m a Broncos fan too, but that’s just unbelievable if you think Tebow should have 90+ spd. The 80 SPD that EA gave him is just right.

      Trust me folks, not every Broncos fan is blinded by Tebow envy as much as this guy.

    • http://twitter.com/MJFobbe Matthew Fobbe

      90 speed is a joke, Tebow isnt really that fast. 

    • Weston_d20

      The hell he should ha e 90 plus speed. Your a fucking dumbass. So what ur saying is just because he had a 40 yard run he should have a 90 in speed. So if peyton manning somehow pulls off a 60 yard td run he should have 90 plus speed cause that’s pretty much wat your saying.

    • Infemous

      lol @ this fool

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GOME5B6RZOTZK3V27OK5JGHORU cbiesra

      Really? None of you could figure out this dude is trolling? 
      I mean his name is Phaggots! It’s kind of obvious.

    • Guest

      How is it that the Broncos are better than the Raiders when the Raiders outscored them by 61 points in their two combined wins against Denver?

  • Go_Seawolves

    broncos are way better than any team in the afc west and they will proove it this year

    • The360King

      This is laughable.  They should be improved, but will likely still be at the bottom of the division.  Don’t forget that there is a shortened offseason and they have not only a new coaching staff but are switching from a 3-4 to a 4-3 defense.  That is really going to hurt their best defensive player, Dumerville.  He will still be a great pass rusher, but his inability to play the run is more exposed in the 4-3 as opposed to the 3-4.

      • Ndman013

        he isn’t going to be a three down player. and by the way as a linebacker he was a much bigger liability than he would be in a 4-3. and he got about 90% of his sacks in 2009 coming from the end position. your statement makes no sense

        • The360King

          Way to focus on the secondary point and not the major one. The main point is that the Broncos, who finished last in the division and were horrible on defense, will have a new coach, new QB one year out of his rookie season, new offense, and new defensive scheme trying to catch up during a shortened season.  They are a team that were behind already and really needed the OTA’s and training camp.  With all that in mind, they Broncos winning the division is an unrealistic goal.  THAT’S THE POINT.

          I think Dumerville would be more exposed in a 4-3 than a 3-4 because the OT would have an immediate opportunity to get his hands on him.  Rushing from the outside he a better opportunity to use his speed and ridiculous quickness to be more disruptive.  You may have an argument that he may play the run better in a 4-3 because he can use his leverage, how undersized he is at 3-4 OLB, and that you can cover him with a LB in the 4-3.  That’s all arguable and we won’t know until we see him in a 3-4.

          And by the way genius, of course he had more sacks in the 4-3.  The Broncos switched to the 3-4 in 2010.  In August 2010 Dumerville was injured and missed the entire season.  So it would make sense that he would have better numbers in a 4-3 than a 3-4, being that he NEVER GOT TO PLAY IN A 3-4.

          • Sportsdudemetalhead

            bronocos did not play in the 3-4 for one season before this upcoming season under new head coach john fox….they played in the 3-4 for the last 2 seasons because mcdaniels was there for a full season and half of last year’s, and he brought over the 3-4 defensive scheme to denver….point being dumerville played in the 3-4 in the 2009-2010 season and recorded 17 sacks so you’re the dumbass dumbass

  • Danny

    I think the strategy behind this is that Moore wants to delay releasing his inaccurate player ratings so that when all hell breaks loose, he’ll be hiding in a safe place.

    • Farttits

      How is “all hell” going to “break loose?” At what point anywhere in this process have you gotten the idea that anyone at EA gives a shit if Donny’s ratings are accurate, or that there’s any way to hold him accountable when they aren’t? The ratings will suck. Same as last year, same as they will next year. Not sure where you’re dreaming up this scenario of some big anti-Donny lynch mob. Ain’t shit gonna come of it.

      • Danny

        It was a joke, relax.

        Must not have been a very good one I guess.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FOX7DHKKTFXWDS5OPC4GVXSDZA Mike

    Not a raiders fan. But didnt they go 6-0 vs the rest of the AFC West last year? yeah

  • Dymez

    I think the Chargers and Chiefs are rated too high.  Especially since Oakland swept that division with ease.

    • The360King

      I think they are rated about right.  I think the Raiders are rated too low. A 79 would be about right.

    • The360King

      I think they are rated about right.  I think the Raiders are rated too low. A 79 would be about right.

  • epbek

    LOL
    The Raiders are 8 points below the Chiefs? The Chiefs had a cupcake schedule and never were competitive against Oakland last year. How do the Raiders go down 3 points from last year? I mean, is based on if Oakland loses Asomugha and Miller? 

    • Anonymous

      If Oakland loses Nnamdi??? That should be edited to “I mean, is this based on Oakland losing Asmougha and possibly Miller?”

      • The360King

        He is likely gone, but he has not signed with another team, so his statement was correct.  I don’t think he will resign with Oakland, but don’t underestimate Al Davis’ love for corners.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000295534671 Jared Baxter

    I read the blog EA posted about all of this. 

    Kansas City Chiefs: 84
    “Jamaal Charles was one of the surprises of the “Madden” cover vote, showing strong support throughout his campaign. His reward? EA Sports makes him one of the most feared backs in Madden with 98 speed.”

    He does not have 98 worthy speed. 

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Victor-WaterBoy-Armstrong/100000099850362 Victor WaterBoy Armstrong

      Yes he is Jamaal Charles is worth a 98 speed. Do you see what he can do to defenses in the NFL.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000295534671 Jared Baxter

        So he is just as fast Mike Wallace who also has 98 speed?

        He may be fast, but he isn’t that fast.

      • Dymez

        Running a 4.38 in the 40 yd dash isn’t worth a 98 speed.  Meanwhile, somebody like Mike Wallace gets the same speed rating and he runs it at 4.28?  It just ain’t right.

        • Aman128ok

          Ok smart guy but what you need to understand is that the 40 yrd dash isnt everything For example devin hester only ran a 4.3 tooo but nobody seemed to be able to catch him for 3 years straight and that also landed him that 100 speed rating on madden that no player had ever recived so yes your point would be legitimant if they were both rookies that we havent seen play but we watched both of them and there isnt that big of diffrence in speed so shutup and learn something about football

          • Dymez

            Nothing you said made any sense.  First of all, Devin Hester ran a 4.27 on his pro day.  4.27 vs. 4.38…….?  Umm…  yeah.  Secondly, we have seen both Jamaal Charles and Mike Wallace play.  And Wallace looks faster than Charles, so that made no sense.  Third, are you REALLLLLY going to use MADDEN as a gauge for who’s faster in real life football?  LMAO!!!  Kid, if you’re a player and you have a gripe with your speed in the game, and you call the developers of Madden, they will boost your speed FOR YOU.

            So…. I think what you need to do is reread your comment, and take your own advice on that last line, son.

          • Guest

            Oh really? You can just call up the madden dev’s and they’ll change you’re ratings? You must of not known what happend to Laurance Maroney then. He complained about his rating in madden, the patriots had a bye week might I mention, and the roster update for that week Maroney’s overall went down. I laughed when I saw them put his rating down.

          • Aman128ok

            Ha Haa Yes that was at his PRO DAY you DUMB ASS at the pro day they use stopwatches which can take a second or too away from your 40 time compared to LASER TIME WHICH IS USED AT THE NFL COMBINE trust me i have done both stop watch and laser…. with stopwatch i ran a 4.7 with laser i ran a 5.0 flat my senior year in high school which explains why devin hester only ran a 4.41 at the draft combine where they use laser time so yea you probly havent been up to date with the technology used today but your time can always vary…. and as for the madden thing i was using it as an example because maddens rating system isnt the greatest but they know who the fastest player in the league is every year so shutup once again….. you willl not win this argument because i know what the hell i am talking about 

          • Dymez

            Kid, you haven’t even proved anything on the subject.  All you did was blabber about Hester’s time, so you already lost.  But as far as Devin Hester goes, he has also been record for running 40’s in 4.19, 4.23, 4.34, 4.35, and a 4.47.  Point being…  He doesn’t give it his all in 40 yard dashes all the time and he’s KNOWN for that.  So, whether it’s his official or unofficial time, you have NO point there (By the way, that 4.23 he ran was at a Pro Bowl weekend competition..  and it was recorded by laser).  And get outta here with that “just using Madden as an example,” kid you swore by that just a minute ago.  LOL!  Listen, kid..  I know you wish you knew what you were talking about.  Believe me.  But you don’t.  So, I’m done here.

          • Aman128ok

            OK to end on this note regardless of how many times he ran… it proves my point even more… that the 40 yrd dash doesnt mean anything LHH i think i set you up for that one pretty good… The 40 doesnt matter its how you play with the equipment on and how fast you are during the game the whole argument was that Mike wallace should be faster than Jamal charles because of they ran diffrent 40 times … so i brung up a good example by using Devin Hester a Guy who consitinly ran diffrent 40 times and no matter what time he got he would still out run any guy in the league in his prime…… so my point was clearly proven the 40 doesnt mean anything  Devin Hester ran at one point a 4.4 but at another point a 4.2 so who knows if Jamal Charles ran his hardest at the combine beacuse clearly devin hester didnt so all in all the 40 doesnt mean anything and to say Mike Wallace should be Faster than Jamal Charles Based off of his 40 time is absolutly LUDACRISS Look I never said MIke isnt Faster than Jamal but your reasons for saying that MIke is Faster are Stupid you cant base it off of a 40…

            Thank you and like i said before im just too good at this type of thing maybe you can win an argument with a NEWB who knows nothing about football but with me NO SIR NOT TODAY POPS MAYBE ANOTHER TYME  

          • Inman85

            this faggot ^^^^ only got one like and it was from himself… he didnt prove anything, and must be a total and complete douche of a 13 year old baby dick little boy

          • Aman128ok

            Ha Ha you are hilarious i love negative critics i fell Like Lil B the BasedGod ha ha but yes i liked my stuff because i realized how good of a debater i am maybe thats why i have an A in that college course ha ha you ppl kill me.. what exactly didnt i prove please explain this to me and look im not a little kid i am 24 and i attend Wash U  and my intelligence should not be questioned…. so what didnt i prove please tell me what i didnt prove  only reason you are insulting me is that you hate the fact that i am kind of conceited which is true i do think a little highly of myself but come on dude what didnt i prove…. did i not prove 40 yrd dashes dont mean anything come on prove me wrong LITTLE MAN and yes i assume you are little because you have the audacity to talk about another mans penis size or you are really fat one or another

            Cant wait to read the stupid comment you are about the post

          • Dymez

            Well, your “set up” didn’t go so well, guy.  Jamaal Charles ran 4.40 on his Pro Day and ran 4.38 at the combine.  Those are very consistent times so that means he’s naturally a 4.4 guy.  The Devin Hester rule doesn’t apply here.  Mike Wallace ran a 4.28 at the combine, a 4.33, and a 4.29 at Steelers training camp last year.  Very consistent, so naturally he’s a sub 4.3 guy.  Devin Hester rules doesn’t apply here neither.

            40 times do matter, guy.  Just ask past players like Deion Sanders, Darrell Green, Robert Smith, and etc, who proved it week in and week out.  Ask curent players like DeSean Jackson, Chris Johnson,  who are displaying it today.  It just doesn’t matter in Madden….  but we don’t swear by it, YOU do.

          • Aman128ok

            Ok you are making points but at the end of the day the 40 isnt accurate enough to make me believe that someones 40 tells wether or not i am faster then you or not whne it comes to the NFL i dont thnk you understand so what i am saying to you is just like guys run different times all the time Mike wallace and Devin Hester being perfect examples of this make the 40 flaud and just not enough to make me think it matters….. some guys dont give the 40 100% effort everytime just like devin hester so how am i suppose to belive that if Jamal Came out right now and ran the 40 100% that he couldnt run a 4.28 just like MIke wallace did another example to throw out there I remembr when I saw film of Deion Sanders combine he came with sweatpants and baggy clothes and ran the 40 half-ass and got the lowest 40 time ever recorded by an NFL player so who knows what deion could have ran with some compressure shorts a tight shirt and 100% effort he could have probably ran a 3.8 or something which all in all just shows how a 40 yrd dash doesnt mean anything …. the NFL isnt running straight with normal street clothes on…. its running with a total of about 5-10 pounds on your body weighing you down and slowing you down so at the end of the day you cant tell me that the 40 means something if THE NFL wants the 40 to mean anything they should make them run it fully padded then we will see the speed diffrence between MIke Wallace and Jamal Charles until then Madden has to judge this off of what they see in games and alll i see is Jamal running by people left and right  just like Mike Wallace is so like i said before the 40 DOESNT MATTER!!!!!!!!!

          • Aman128ok

            OK to end on this note regardless of how many times he ran… it proves my point even more… that the 40 yrd dash doesnt mean anything LHH i think i set you up for that one pretty good… The 40 doesnt matter its how you play with the equipment on and how fast you are during the game the whole argument was that Mike wallace should be faster than Jamal charles because of they ran diffrent 40 times … so i brung up a good example by using Devin Hester a Guy who consitinly ran diffrent 40 times and no matter what time he got he would still out run any guy in the league in his prime…… so my point was clearly proven the 40 doesnt mean anything  Devin Hester ran at one point a 4.4 but at another point a 4.2 so who knows if Jamal Charles ran his hardest at the combine beacuse clearly devin hester didnt so all in all the 40 doesnt mean anything and to say Mike Wallace should be Faster than Jamal Charles Based off of his 40 time is absolutly LUDACRISS Look I never said MIke isnt Faster than Jamal but your reasons for saying that MIke is Faster are Stupid you cant base it off of a 40…

            Thank you and like i said before im just too good at this type of thing maybe you can win an argument with a NEWB who knows nothing about football but with me NO SIR NOT TODAY POPS MAYBE ANOTHER TYME  

          • 43steel43

            YOU IS SLOWER THAN A MF

  • Pingback: Madden NFL 12 Team Ratings Arriving Ahead of the Players – Pasta Padre()

  • Brian Cole

    why cant players have ratings like the teams. I mean there is no team that is ever a 99 or 97 these should be ratings for players around 90 and below and a few top players get the above 90 rating(91-95)

  • Inman85

    packers are going to be rated like a fucking 96 i cannot wait

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MFD6K3UIFSDLU4HX5BGOREQABM Matt W

      Packers are already the most ridiculous team on Madden in a long time.  Unstoppable offense with good wrs, an uncoverable TE, bruising rbs, a qb who can scramble and a solid all around D with 2 shutdown corners and a 3rd mid to high 70s corner with high 90s speed.

    • Adam

      I can’t wait until EVERYBODY uses them online, just like everybody uses the Heat online in NBA 2k11.

      • Inman85

        as a huge packers fan im gonna hate it but i dont play online because im not a fan of playing 12 year old kids who use the same 10 plays that work  over and over again

        • 43steel43

          HOW ABOUT PLAYING PEOPLE WHO ONLY USES 4 PLAYS THE WHOLE GAME, I HOPE THE DEFENSIVE A.I IS BETTER ON THIS TO STOP THAT CRAP FROM HAPPENING, I MEAN ITS OVER 30 PLAYS IN A PLAYBOOK  WHY USE ONLY 3-4 PLAYS THE WHOLE GAME. SMH AT THAT CRAP

  • http://twitter.com/MJFobbe Matthew Fobbe

    Am I the only one who watched the Jets manhandle the Patriots int he playoffs last year?

    • Aman128ok

      wasnt a man handle buddy it was a one touchdown win you idiot

      • TonyMush

        The Jets dominated that game from start to finish. The score makes it look closer than it really is.

        • Aman128ok

          correct but the patriots still had an awesome regular season so the cant knock them for the playoff beating they recieved its called any giving sunday one loss doesnt take away from an entire season  if that was the case alot of these teams like the cheifs and the chargers wouldnt be rated high at all

  • Aajaimes94

    Come the raiders should b higher then the chiefs….. They raped them at the end of the year without dmac….. And they had 2 force Matt cassal out of the game cuz he was getting pounded by the raiders D

    • Phaggots

      The broncos will take the division this year!!! Von Miller baby

  • Aman128ok

    Ok Lets put some PPL to rest……. ONE Stop bashing Tebow he has only had one year to play and only started 3 games and was 1-2 in those games….. give him a chance and not to mention he had and impressive 684 yards 5tds and 3int in those 3 games while also rushing for 227 yrds and 6 tds so shutup and go look at some statistics ok!!! SECOND the Team Ratings are pretty accurate the Broncos are not better then the Raiders as of now and its only by 2 points shutup people……. Lastly the Cheifs are a solid team with young talent that in a few years will be capable of Superbowl Contention Eric Berry can be one of the best Safetys in the League in a couple years and Jamal Charles TOO who is an Elite Back and yes Jamal Charles is deserving of that 98 speed he ran circles around every defense that faced him and proved that his speed and agility is surpasing alot of other RB’s… but no he isnt faster than Mike Wallace but Mike isnt that much faster than him so only fair that Mike either goes to 99 speed or they just stay even Mike only ran .2 seconds faster then Jamal in the 40 

    So thank you that is all

    • Cbhadha

      i think J.Charles belongs at 97.  Mike Wallace at 98 and DeSean Jackson at 99.

      • Aman128ok

        Well no complaint about that i just think that the diffrence in speed between the two isnt as big as others make it seem Jamal is Very Fast and so is Mike

        • Leaciancio

          You have to take acceleration into account to. Speed itself isn’t everything.

          • Aman128ok

            Your right but I wasnt addressing in general i was addresing the guy who seemed to be mad at the fact the Jamal Charles and Mike Wallace had the same speed but yes i do understand that acceleration is a stat that matters

          • 43steel43

            CJ IS THE ONLY PLAYER WHO SUPPOSE TO BE A 99 SPD

  • Guero

    If anything, Raiders are rated 76 because of our O Line.  I still think its too low tho, especially when the Cheffs and Chargers are rated 84/85 (Didnt we Beat Both teams, TWICE last year, including the Donkeys).  And True, J. Cherles is not a 98 Spead, hes Quick and Fast, But not that fast.  Did anybody see the play when we fubled and DHB Over ran the Player by like 7 yards??? But hes only a 97 Speed, Bet J. Charles cant catch DHB but hes still a 98 lol… Just Win Now Baby

  • maeby

    Why Mike Wallace’s speed rating is not 99 is beyond me…

  • maeby

    Why Mike Wallace’s speed rating is not 99 is beyond me…

  • Lesciancio

    So funny seeing guys complain about Wallace and Charles speed. U have to take into account their acceleration which I’m sure Wallace will have a higher rating.

    • CitiBoy7

      Im surprised nobody is talking about how the bengals is the worst team in madden when we are still better than the browns who went 1-5 in the division and they only beat us once but just because their running back is on the cover that makes them better wow. I feel confident that the browns will go back to being the worst team in the afc north this year.

      • tecmobrowns

         where can i find you to dog your azz when hillis and mccoy beasts on your sorry azz bungles team?

        • CitiBoy7

          Seriously you have to admit the browns are not contending this year and yall can’t even hang with our division where the browns went 1-5 cmon man but only way you gonna reach me is on xbox live DRE2385 gt where I can dog ya ass on madden and then watch the same story play out in reality.

      • 43steel43

        NO CARSON PALMER NO GOOD RECORD FOR THE BENGALS

  • Guest

    Donny Moore is a retard.

  • SilkCB21

    Let me start by saying it’s clear to see who actually plays or played football and who jus plays madden or watches football by reading these comments…another thing if u ask me team ratings are OVERRATED…ppl can pick the worst teams and still find a way to win either legit or cheating…either way if ur a true fan of a team and really utilize there strengths and weakness especially in this years madden ratings won’t mean shit

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=635051958 Michael Kare

    The Cowboys can be rated whatever. I’ll whoop all of you online with them

    • Logic

      You are right because the speed and attributes of each player in the skill positions are overrated. Why? Simple Moore is a Cowboys fan. Secretly they are the best team. In real life they always get smashed on by other teams. Team ratings mean nothing.

      • 43steel43

        TRUE,SPEED IS THE ONLY ATTRIBUTE THAT MATTERS, IN MADDEN11 THE COWBOYS HAVE A WR THAT HAS A 45 OVR WITH A CATCH RATING OF 52 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT BUT WITH A 97 SPD AND HE PLAYS LIKE A 95, WTF IS THAT CRAP, YOU CAN GET ANY PLAYER WITH SPD WITH NO AWR AND NOTHING ELSE AND HE WOULD BE A GREAT WR ON MADDEN.

        • Logic

           I know if you are gutsy enough to have your 92 overall 88 speed corner alone with a reciever that’s 66 overall with 97 speed then  go ahead, because in Madden that’s suicide. It’s ashame that attributes don’t matter in Madden. In real life, Terrence Newman gets burnt, but in Madden someone how he is faster than Percy Harvin, C.J. Spiller, Jahvid Beast, Jeremy Maclin, Mario Manningham, one point slower than Mike Wallace and Desean Jackson, and Devery Henderson, and you can’t go seep on him with his 97 speed. Hhe is 3 point away from perfect speed. Now how do you explain that after many season plagued injuires and getting burnt constantly how is this possible. That makes Newman one of the best corners on the game. I’m not hating just keeping it real.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=635051958 Michael Kare

    The Cowboys can be rated whatever. I’ll whoop all of you online with them

  • joe somebody

    yeah oakland is the best team playing inner division games going 6-0 but still suck overall but better than the broncos

  • Lehmsbobby

    EA SPORTS SAYS GAME ON! #GameOn #Madden #NFL #FOOTBALLBACK
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaeiP54fn7s

  • Randy

    How are the Steelers higher than the Pats? Doesn’t make sense to me, but whatever

    • 43steel43

      did the pats make it to the sb or the afc championship?????? thats how they are better!!!!!   HATERRRRRRR

Sponsors
Categories
Featured Video